Copyedit Assessment

Conduct a **copyedit assessment** of this fiction manuscript. Evaluate the work at the **sentence level**, focusing on prose polish, grammar, word choice, and mechanical correctness.

**Prerequisites:** This assessment assumes the manuscript is **structurally sound** and has **passed line editing**. Plot, character, pacing, scene construction, and paragraph flow should be resolved before copyediting. If you encounter significant structural or line-level problems, note them and recommend returning to the appropriate earlier stage.

**This is the final polish.** Focus on making every sentence as clean, clear, and effective as possible.

---

## Instructions

1. **Review the manuscript** in `Manuscript Material/`.

2. **Assess the manuscript** across each domain listed below.

3. **Produce a structured report** with:
   - A summary of findings for each domain
   - Patterns identified (not exhaustive lists of every error)
   - Specific examples from the manuscript (with locations)

4. **Conclude with**:
   - An overall assessment of copyedit readiness
   - The most prevalent issues requiring attention
   - Strengths in prose craft

---

## Assessment Domains

### Sentence Craft

- **Sentence variety** — Is there variation in sentence length and structure, or monotonous patterns?
- **Sentence clarity** — Are sentences grammatically clear? Any confusing constructions?
- **Sentence rhythm** — Does the prose have a pleasing cadence? Awkward rhythms?
- **Run-ons and fragments** — Used intentionally for effect, or errors?

### Word Choice

- **Precision** — Are words chosen for accuracy? Vague or imprecise language?
- **Repetition (micro)** — Repeated words within sentences or paragraphs? Echo words?
- **Clichés** — Overused phrases that could be fresher?
- **Said-bookisms** — Overuse of dialogue tag synonyms (exclaimed, queried, opined)?
- **Adverb overuse** — Telling via adverb where action could show?
- **Filter words** — Unnecessary distancing (saw, felt, heard, noticed, realized, seemed)?
- **Purple prose** — Overwritten passages? Trying too hard?
- **Register consistency** — Does vocabulary match character voice and narrative tone?

### Grammar and Mechanics

- **Subject-verb agreement**
- **Tense consistency** — Unintentional tense shifts?
- **Pronoun-antecedent agreement**
- **Modifier placement** — Dangling or misplaced modifiers?
- **Parallel structure** — Lists and comparisons grammatically parallel?

### Punctuation

- **Comma usage** — Missing, excessive, or misplaced commas?
- **Dialogue punctuation** — Correct formatting of dialogue tags and action beats?
- **Apostrophes** — Possessives and contractions correct?
- **Semicolons and colons** — Used correctly?
- **Em dashes and ellipses** — Consistent formatting? Overused?
- **Quotation marks** — Consistent style (curly vs. straight)? Correct placement with punctuation?

### Spelling and Typos

- **Spelling errors**
- **Homophone confusion** (their/there/they're, its/it's, etc.)
- **Proper noun consistency** — Character and place names spelled consistently?
- **Typos and transpositions**

### Formatting Consistency

- **Chapter/scene break formatting** — Consistent markers?
- **Emphasis formatting** — Italics used consistently for thoughts, emphasis, foreign words?
- **Number formatting** — Spelled out vs. numerals consistent?
- **Capitalization conventions** — Consistent treatment of titles, terms, etc.?

### Common Patterns to Flag

- **That/which confusion**
- **Who/whom errors**
- **Lay/lie confusion**
- **Fewer/less misuse**
- **Affect/effect confusion**
- **Passive voice overuse** — Where active would be stronger
- **Nominalizations** — Verbs turned into nouns weakening prose

---

## Output Format

```
# Copyedit Assessment

## Executive Summary
[1-2 paragraphs: Overall impression of the manuscript's sentence-level craft. Is the prose clean? What patterns need attention? Is it ready for final proofread, or does it need a copyedit pass?]

## Prior Stage Check
[Brief confirmation that structure and line-level craft are sound, or note if issues remain that should be addressed first.]

## Domain Assessments

### Sentence Craft
**Patterns Observed:**
**Examples:** [Include locations]

### Word Choice
**Patterns Observed:**
**Specific Repetitions/Overuses:**
**Examples:**

### Grammar and Mechanics
**Patterns Observed:**
**Examples:**

### Punctuation
**Patterns Observed:**
**Examples:**

### Spelling and Typos
**Frequency:** [Rare / Occasional / Frequent]
**Examples:**

### Formatting Consistency
**Issues Found:**
**Examples:**

---

## Copyedit Readiness

[Needs Full Copyedit / Needs Targeted Cleanup / Ready for Final Proofread]

**Needs Full Copyedit** — Pervasive issues across multiple domains; thorough sentence-by-sentence pass needed.
**Needs Targeted Cleanup** — Specific patterns to address, but most prose is clean.
**Ready for Final Proofread** — Prose is polished; one final error-check pass and it's done.

---

## Most Prevalent Issues
1.
2.
3.

## Prose Strengths
1.
2.
3.

## Pattern Summary

[Quick-reference list of patterns the author should search for and correct]

| Pattern | Frequency | Example |
|---------|-----------|---------|
| Filter word "felt" | High | "She felt the cold wind" → "The cold wind bit her skin" |
| Comma splices | Medium | Ch. 4, Ch. 9 |
| "That" where "who" needed | Low | Ch. 2 |
| ... | ... | ... |

## Recommended Next Steps
[Practical recommendations. Which issues can be fixed with find-and-replace? Which require reading through? Suggested order of attack?]
```

---

## Tone

Be **precise, practical, and efficient**. Copyediting is technical work. Identify patterns clearly, give examples, and provide actionable guidance. The author needs to know what to fix and how to find it.

---

## Important Notes

- **Identify patterns, not exhaustive lists** — If "felt" appears 200 times, note the pattern and give examples; don't list all 200 instances.
- **Do not re-litigate structure or scene construction** — If you see those issues, note them briefly and recommend returning to the appropriate stage.
- **Distinguish style from error** — Intentional sentence fragments for effect are not errors. Consistent authorial choices in punctuation may be style. Note when something is a potential issue vs. a clear error.
- **Note what's working** — Clean prose has craft. Acknowledge strong sentence work, not just problems.
- **Be specific with locations** — Reference chapters or scenes so the author can find issues.